Category Archives: Writing

Suspension of Disbelief

In writing any fictional story, we need to persuade the reader that the world we’re creating is believable, and the things happening to the characters in that world are feasible—so they accept that it could happen to them—meaning they bond with the characters and want to know what happens to them. The bond can be one of dislike, of course, for to be successful a novel needs a great villain.

Thriller writer John Buchan, best known for The Thirty-Nine Stepsput things well:

A good story should have incidents which defy the probabilities, and march just inside the borders of the possible.

Image result for The Thirty-Nine Steps,

To encourage readers to stay on the journey of reading your story, rather than get on with their own lives, the characters that inhabit the page have to show their humanity. Fictional characters need to be extraordinary to attract interest in the first place, but it’s their vulnerabilities, dreams and setbacks that make readers sympathise with them. No one likes a smart arse in real life or in fiction. The detectives, superheroes, sexual athletes and knights in armour we create should falter as much as we all do, before achieving their goals.

Iain M. Banks said: The trouble with writing fiction is that it has to make sense, whereas real life doesn’t.

That’s also the joy of writing fiction, for as writers, we lead our readers by the nose, tugging at their heartstrings along the way and teasing their brains to work out what happens next. They have to be drawn into the story, to trust the integrity of the plot and care what happens to the characters. One thing that might well drive them away, is if they spot glaring mistakes—be they continuity errors, such as getting a name wrong, or factual blunders.

I write crime fiction, and about half of the novels I read are of this genre, so I’m alert to mistakes. I’ve given up on reading novels where it was obvious the author had never been in a physical fight in their lives, and had no idea of how to describe one, where they’d specified the wrong calibre of ammunition for a gun, or had their hero shadow a suspect’s car along a lonely desert road for 250 miles without being spotted (or needing to refuel their gas-guzzling V8-engined car). My favourite piece of ridiculousness, which destroyed any sense of belief I’d built up, was when a parked Harley-Davidson motorcycle, weighing 600 pounds, fell over after being shot through the petrol tank with one bullet—as if it was a person—“Urggh, yer got me!”

Even if you’re writing about fantasy or science-fiction heroes, keep things real.

I’ve found that writing from the third person POV allows a cooler approach than introducing a tale in the first person, which is intensely close. A reader needs time to bond with the narrator, and third person gives an impartiality which doesn’t force them to think in a certain way. On the other hand, stories with unreliable narrators need the first person viewpoint, however twisted their thoughts are, making the reader work out the truth of what they’re saying. I previously questioned the effectiveness of unreliable narrators, for if all of the characters are unlikeable, then why should readers continue to support a tangled web of disbelief full of spiders that are all biting you?

Many plots depend on coincidence and lucky accident to work, but that’s just the way of fiction, and provided the happenstance isn’t too convenient and unbelievable, then readers will play along. I freely admit, that my own protagonist detective is a miracle worker, who’d make Sherlock Holmes look like Inspector Clouseau, for he solves complicated investigations within six months. In reality, a major crime team might take years to bust a criminal, but that would try A reader’s patience—unless it’s ‘faction’ based on actual crimes.

Keeping the attention of the reader requires immediacy, they like having things explained to them, especially if they’ve already guessed why something happened. This is a damned sight more than what happens in real life, where stuff just happens without our permission, and we have to sort out the mess!

Suspense within a story, whatever the genre, makes readers eager to know the ending. The questions we raised at the beginning need resolution by the time we type The End.

E. M. Forster put it well: Story as such, can only have one merit: that of making the audience want to know what happens next. And conversely it can only have one fault—that of making the audience not want to know what happens next.

If you make the reader feel something about your story, to have an emotional reaction to it, then they haven’t noticed you as a narrator (transparency is our ideal state) for they believe in the truth of what you’ve written.

Image result for book suspension of disbelief cartoon

The Problem with Unreliable Narrators

There are trends in storytelling, which spawn imitations. J.K. Rowling’s success with wizards led to a rash of similar books. Fifty Shades of Grey lubricated the thrust of mummy porn. More recently, there have been a host of novels with unreliable narrators, the best-known being The Girl on the Train and Gone Girl.

Unreliable narrators have been around for ages, in such classics as Lolita, Wuthering Heights, The Great Gatsby and The Catcher In The Rye. What goes around comes around, but I’ve found the recent novels told through the POV of a severely compromised narrator to be poorly written. This hasn’t stopped them selling in their millions, with film adaptations.

I had to force myself through The Girl on the Train, just to see what happened in the end. It’s not just me being grumpy, as others have criticised Paula Hawkins’ abilities.

Image result for novel the girl on the train

She’s got a new novel out, Into The Water, which I haven’t seen a good review of yet. Critics’ unfavourable opinions won’t stop it becoming a bestseller, that also gets adapted into a Hollywood film. It’s galling to realise that novels which become popular only do so because readers are intrigued by the concept, not caring about the skill of the writing and that they buy a book because all of their friends have—it’s a social phenomenon—never mind the quality, feel the width.

For me, the main problem with Paula Hawkins’ and Gillian Flynn’s unreliable narrators was that I didn’t care what happened to them, or to the characters they interacted with, as most of them were weak, irritating and nasty too. Overall, I finished these bestsellers feeling depressed for the human condition.

I’ve written using an unreliable narrator in just one of my novels, so far. The Perfect Murderer was told from a multiple POV, including the detective protagonist, his team, a pathologist and the suspects they were hunting. One was a serial killer, whose bizarre slayings aroused the bloodlust of an unsuspected career murderer, a retired chief of detectives who’d murdered a harden criminal every year for forty years. He was a member of the establishment, and the hardline views he expressed about crime didn’t suggest that he’d been taking things into his own hands. I differentiated between his thoughts and those of the serial killer by calling the latter the killer’ and the old copper the murderer’.

I thought this device was obvious and guessable, so was pleased when my three readers were shocked at the twist in the tale. The copper’s ramblings and his homicidal campaign of retribution were caused by a brain tumour, which he escaped by committing suicide before he was arrested. Although he was a difficult man to like, and severely flawed, I managed to make him sympathetic.

How do you handle unreliable narrators?

Image result for charles palliser quote unreliable narrator

Charles Palliser

Literary Relics

This article, with an intriguing video, appeared in The New Yorker.

Whatever you call it—relics, paraphernalia or realia—the objects discussed verge from touching to revealing to downright macabre. It smacks of trophy-taking to me, in the same way as serial killers keep mementoes of their victims…a button, lock of hair or body part!

There has to be a limit to what collectors will hoard (and admit to owning), based on taste and decency. Would the stones, that Virginia Woolf weighed her already heavy overcoat down with, be collectable? Her suicide letter certainly is. What about the empty shotgun cartridge shell, that once housed the pellets that Ernest Hemingway used to blow his head apart? Japanese novelist, Yukio Mishima committed seppuku, ritual suicide by disembowelling himself with a sword—is that blade a literary relic?

Having seen how a writer’s life and career are turned into a thriving business, when my nearest pub was Jamaica Inn, on Bodmin Moor, famed for Daphne du Maurier’s novel, I’m somewhat cynical about how some authors get deified. Having fifty coachloads of tourists visit a building every day, just because it was used as the location for a story is an odd way of showing devotion. In the UK, similar things occur with the Brontës, Charles Dickens, William Shakespeare, George Bernard Shaw and Wordsworth. Whole tourist industries depend of people wanting to visit the homes of writers and places where they set their books, even if the tourists haven’t read the novel and only vaguely remember the film adaptation.

From time to time, an auction lot will receive publicity in the media, as being the desk of a famous writer, and some of them go for eye-watering prices.

Writer’s pens are similarly revered.

All of this glorification of buildings, working tools, personal possessions, and even body parts and death masks, made me wonder what the hell I could leave behind for posterity—assuming, of course, that my Cornish Detective series brings me adulation!

Perhaps the scraps of card, that I cut from teabag and cereal boxes, to make on-the-fly notes about my WIP would be endlessly fascinating….How about the cooling cradle, that’s kept my ancient laptop functioning for nine years? My faded plastic library card has helped to preserve my sanity and being Cornwall Libraries, it carries an attractive photo of an abandoned engine house.

Getting personal, taking a death mask of my fizzog would be tricky, owing to beard and moustache, though my hands have been praised, by various girlfriends, for being attractive, and they sure do a lot of typing. My skin is as wrinkled as crumpled tissue paper, these days, and I wonder if the impressive scars (from fights and workshop accidents) would show? Failing that, I could break out the Viagra and go the Plaster Caster route…it’d be something for visitors to hang their coats on!

What literary relic would you leave to your adoring fans and academic scholars?

Keat’s death mask: sold at auction in 1996 for £16,100.

Throwing Rocks

Vladamir Nabokov suggested that: “The writer’s job is to get the main character up a tree, and then once they are up there, throw rocks at them.”

It’s common advice from writing coaches, to endanger your protagonist, to set them challenges that they need to overcome to get to where they’re going—which is often simply returning the situation to normal. Think of what Frodo went through in The Lord of The Rings, just to get rid of that pesky ring.

No one likes a smart arse, and a completely indomitable hero would be boring, running the risk of making their opponents more appealing…which is always likely to happen anyway, as readers identify more with character flaws than moral strength. Fighting the system is more romantic than defending it. Far more murderers’ names are recalled, than the lawmen who captured or killed them.

A protagonist becomes more attractive when they show their humanity. If they make mistakes, especially if the reader knows they’re doing so and they don’t, it elicits sympathy and the reader gets behind their efforts. Such vulnerability needn’t make the hero sappy: we all know what sort of hand a velvet glove contains.

Some authors take their abuse of their protagonist to extremes. Jo Nesbö regularly throws his Swedish detective Harry Hole into ghastly situations, including being addicted to booze and drugs, getting captured and tortured, as well as framed and suspended from duties, beaten-up, stabbed and shot. In the first novel of the series The Bat, Harry is a fish out of water, investigating a serial killer in Australia and is also drinking like a fish!

Image result for harry hole the bat

I introduced my protagonist Detective Chief Inspector Neil Kettle standing on a Cornish beach in winter, looking at the nude corpse of a naturist, who appears to have been murdered. He’s trying not to think about the last time he was there, with his wife, who died in a traffic accident two years before. Hopefully, readers will sympathise with his state of mind, while admiring his fortitude in pursuing the killer.

He clings to his job as a way of coping with life, as he spirals down into depression, and it’s not until the end of Book 2 that he’s functioning anything like normal. He’s been brought low by his illness, but his detective colleagues have also faced threats—his ageing deputy is mugged and knocked unconscious and kicked hard enough to break ribs, prompting his retirement. In the next book, his replacement becomes the last victim of a serial killer, pounded to death with a primitive mace—a club with nails. On another case, a detective’s personal life is disrupted when a murdering husband and wife, disgraced intelligence agents with a grudge against society, hack into her emails. They glean enough information to attack the police force’s site, disrupting the investigation into them.

Various coppers get clobbered while making arrests, but Neil is cleverly poisoned by the ex-agents, who use poison-dart frog toxin to knock him out, sending him into hallucinations. In the last story, completed in 2018, in the penultimate chapter, Neil is stabbed and slashed, defending himself by almost battering his assailant to death with an extendable baton.

He’s in intensive care at the close of the story, in a coma and receiving blood transfusions. He faces suspension for his attack on the swordsman—who’s died.

I enjoyed putting my protagonist in jeopardy…burying him in an avalanche of violence with consequences for his career.

What rocks have you thrown at your characters?

How are they damaged by the threats to their life?

Do they wreak revenge?

Have you killed any of your goodies off?

A Writer’s Conscience

Various famous authors have said things about conscience and the writing process. Chekhov claimed: “I confess I seldom commune with my conscience when I write.”

Joseph Campbell, a key figure in writing theory, showed a little more restraint, but not much: Writer’s block results from too much head. Cut off your head. Pegasus, poetry, was born of Medusa when her head was cut off. You have to be reckless when writing. Be as crazy as your conscience allows.”

Anne Lamott is more inclusive of her conscience, stating that taking a stance adds to the beauty of the work: “Writing takes a combination of sophistication and innocence; it takes conscience, our belief that something is beautiful because it is right.”

Leo Tolstoy advised: “Beware of anything that is not approved by your conscience.”

In writing stories, we have to choose where we stand. 

The internet offers the ultimate get-out, absolving an author of responsibility for revealing information, for after all, if it’s online anyone could find it. Filmmakers have long been accused of inciting real-life violence by showing it on screen, with arguments that it does and that it doesn’t.

Film directors can get very touchy about the issue: 

Do your stories have a message for good? It needn’t be heavy-handed and preachy

Or, do you worry that your book might deprave readers?

Image result for .https://i0.wp.com/www.toonpool.com/user/997/files/conscience_guide_sociopath_1056045.jpg?w=474&ssl=1

Dressing Your Characters

They say that “Clothes make the man.” Modern-day research has proved there’s a lot of truth in this old adage, with people making snap judgements based on what someone is wearing.

In my Cornish Detective series, I tend to avoid giving elaborate descriptions of my characters’ clothing. With the rugged landscape of the county, my coppers dress practically for the conditions, and my protagonist, Neil Kettle, favours leather jackets, sturdy Gore-Tex-lined walking boots and a full-length wax-proof Belstaff coat when it’s pouring down.

He also wears ‘costumes’ appropriate for his leisure activities, of motorcycle riding (full leathers), painting (an artist’s smock) and gardening—when he tends to go bare-chested, wielding his scythe on a meadow he’s growing, in Ross Poldark fashion.

Image result for aidan turner poldark scythe

Other detectives on Neil’s team have their own tastes in clothing, with one homely detective (the sharpest of the bunch) looking like “she should be baking a cake on a television commercial”, while her female colleague a lesbian ex-nurse, who’s a brown belt in karate, prefers form-fitting clothing that allows her ease of movement, as she “prowls like panther.” Neil’s second-in-command is British-Asian, a city lad, unused to the country, who’s trying to fit in by clothing himself in brogue shoes, corduroy trousers and tweed jackets from the farmers’ outfitters. A rugby-playing detective constable is huge, “as big as a wardrobe” and forced into buying clothing from a Big Man store. They all wear stab proof and bullet proof vests when going to make an arrest.

Despite their different clothing tastes, they all still look like coppers when out and about, which is one reason that Neil enjoys riding his chopper, dressed as a biker, as no one thinks he’s a policeman.

With my fictional villains, a serial killer is a master of disguise, from his time as a sniper in war zones, so wears camouflage outfits that blend into the landscape. In public, he strives to be unnoticeable, wearing bland clothing bought from charity shops, and regularly changing it, along with altering his facial appearance by the use of facial prosthetics and full head vinyl masks.

At the opposite extreme, the owner of a chain of massage parlours is a narcissistic self-publicist, favouring a gold lamé suit, golden-tanned skin from sunbeds, chunky gold jewellery and a gold Jaguar XJ8.

In my last novel, one of the witnesses is a heavily-muscled sculptress, who wears undistinguished dungarees and a T-shirt while pounding on granite to create a bust, but her arms are sleeved with ink from colourful tattoos. The antagonist of the story, an eccentric art gallery owner dresses as if he’s time-travelled from 125 years ago. He’s obsessed with paintings, preferring them to people, and has retreated to Victorian times in his attitude to women, foreigners and in what he wears. He favours handmade shoes, cufflinks, wing-collared shirts, hand-tied bow ties, three-piece suits, pocket watches and a silk-lined woollen cloak; to read anything, he perches pince-nez spectacles on the bridge of his nose.

As a break from writing novels, last year I penned the second tale in what will become a quartet of short stories about an American Civil War veteran. He’s trying to rebuild his life, as his country does the same thing in the Period of Reconstruction. Dressing him required much thought and research, for it was a treacherous time of divided loyalties—just because a peace treaty’s been signed doesn’t mean to say that the war has stopped raging in ex-soldiers’ souls. In a time of great poverty, many old warriors wore a combination of ex-army uniforms, treading a fine line over what was acceptable. My protagonist is suffering from PTSD, ever alert for ambush and has made himself into a walking arsenal, with weapons hidden all over his body. He’s modified his clothing to allow quick and easy access to revolvers, knives and a sawn-off shotgun. His full-length duster coat conceals a lot.

S&S Trail Duster Coat

The lead character in a short story I wrote, about a man falsely accused of killing a young woman whose body his dog found while out on a walk in the country, is a retired-locomotive driver with zero interest in looking fashionable. He dresses for comfort, doing his own clumsy repairs to waterproof clothing, unaware of how peculiar and intimidating he looks…which becomes a factor in the case that’s built against him. I was inspired by an extraordinary photograph of the man who would be King—Prince Charles—wearing his favourite wax-proof coat covered in repair patches.

Have you created any characters fashion victims, obsessed with wearing the right label?

How do you decide what the protagonist of a fantasy story wears?

I’ve only written one story set in space, on Mars in the 23rd-century, and one of the trickiest aspects was getting the space suit, helmet and boots right. If you write science fiction, do you gloss over such details or do they become an integral part of the story?

What do ghosts wear? Presumably, their historical clothing gives them away.

Do your characters accessorize?

Bad Reviews

It’s sometimes said that getting a bad review is better than getting no reviews at all. Some readers like checking out what a book is really like if there are loads of one and two-star reviews amongst higher ratings. As Oscar Wilde advised: There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.

Criticism can be succinct. The pithy humorist Ambrose Bierce was asked to evaluate a sleep-inducing tome and apparently, he handed in a caustic one-line review: The covers of this book are too far apart.

That doesn’t mean to say that harsh words don’t hurt. As Thomas Mann has written:

Our receptivity to praise stands in no relationship to our vulnerability to mean disdain and spiteful abuse. No matter how stupid such abuse is, no matter how plainly impelled by private rancours, as an expression of hostility it occupies us far more deeply and lastingly than praise. Which is very foolish, since enemies are, of course, the necessary concomitant of any robust life, the very proof of its strength.”

Jean Cocteau took a sanguine  approach to critics:

Listen very carefully to the first criticisms of your work. Note just what it is about your work that the reviewers don’t like; it may be the only thing in your work that is original and worthwhile.”

I was prompted into starting this thread, after reading a witty review of a 1973 British science fiction film, called The Final Programme, which was on the Talking Pictures channel of Freeview recently. Based on a novel written by Michael Moorcock, strangely, it was the only one of his books to be filmed. From the outset, it’s a mess, and curious about its history, I looked online. One critic found the film “an almost unmitigated disaster”, with “an ending so inane that you will want your money back even if you wait and see it on television.

A poor review for a film can mean box office disaster, though there are plenty of movies that were savaged by critics, but loved by audiences. This tends to happen with a series of films, where the standard deteriorates: Scary Movie 5 was detested by the critics, but still filled theatre seats, making a profit of $58.4 million.

I thought that with books, readers would pay more attention to reviews, as it’s certainly one of the ways that I choose what to read, but according to several surveys I looked at, a tiny percentage, about 2%, cite reviews as being a determining factor. Rather, people choose by browsing within a genre they favour and look for authors they already know.

This should be encouraging, though there’s still the problem of how to get known in the first place. As unknown authors, if we’re self-publishing, we’re advised that it’s vital to get favourable book reviews, and hustlers made a lucrative living offering pay-for reviews.

I admit, that when looking for books to read, by requesting them from my public library, a bad review will put me off, though I retain loyalty to authors that I like so I may try a title that gets panned. Some fans of best-selling writers don’t care either way. At the time of writing, in April 2019, E.L. James has just published her first novel outside the 50 Shades series. Called The Mister, I’ve yet to see a good review of it.

Will that affect sales?

What do you think?

Image result for rubbish book we'll publish it cartoon

KISS: Your Story’s Themes

I came across a quote by American figurative painter Alex Katz which set me wondering about the themes of my last novel.

It’s usually three-quarters of the way through writing a novel, that I pause to contemplate whether what I intended the underlying message of my story to be has actually been expressed. Also, has the story arc of my protagonist continued in a convincing way, staying true to his character established in previous novels?

A writer doesn’t have to be preachy to create a story that communicates something worth knowing about the human condition. As Julian Barnes commented:

“Books say: she did this because. Life says: she did this. Books are where things are explained to you, life where things aren’t.”

I like to think that once somebody has read one of my Cornish Detective novels, they might start thinking in a slightly different way about a contentious subject, such as illegal immigration and slavery. This was one component of Book 1, Who Kills A Nudist? with the antagonist, a criminal who was part of a worldwide network of human traffickers, treating people as goods—like the drugs and weapons he also smuggled.

The KISS principle of Keep It Simple, Stupid should apply to the underlying theme of a story, with your skill as a writer providing the artifice that enchants a reader into losing themselves in your words. But, it still has to ring true. As 20th-century best-selling novelist Margaret Culkin Banning advised:

“Fiction is not a dream. Nor is it guess work. It is imagining based on facts, and the facts must be accurate or the work will not stand up.”

I’ve given up on reading many a crime novel that was riddled with inaccuracies, depressed not just by the author’s laziness, but also at the slapdash inefficiency of whoever edited the manuscript at the publishers. Once upon a time, editors checked facts: they don’t seem to bother these days. At least these travesties motivate me into getting my facts right—while avoiding an information dump. I look upon such details as the interesting smells that makes a dog pause on its walkies—there to be briefly savoured—but not completely halting the journey.

With my last novel, the plot involves theft, forgery, artistic creativity, prostitution, bereavement, falling in love and murder, but the simple theme is that relationships are more important than money or possessions.

What are the themes of your work in progress?

Image result for book theme cartoons

Tackling Editing

In an interview that originally appeared in the Guardian, George Saunders, author of Lincoln In The Bardo explains how he edits his writing.

With the experimental form of Lincoln In The Bardo I imagine that he did hundreds of rewrites of its 340 pages; to give you some idea of the complexity of the narrative, the audiobook version uses 166 readers—including Hollywood stars Julianne Moore, Ben Stiller, Lena Dunham and Don Cheadle.

Image result for Lincoln in the Bardo

I like what Saunders says about respecting the reader. Saunders uses a computer to write his manuscripts, which must have made things easier with his successful novel:

“I write in Word. I loved WordPerfect, but then the Word juggernaut rolled right over the poor little guy. This computer is given to me by my university and the default word-processing program is Word – so there you go. The only thing I ever write longhand anymore are notebook entries. And even then I usually end up typing them into a file. I have really horrible handwriting. I print out every day so there’s no danger of losing anything. And lots of times, in retrospect, it might have been better if I had lost something.”

These days, with the ease of altering a manuscript that a computer gives us, I sometimes wonder about what the definition of a new draft really is….

In the old laborious days of writing everything in longhand, and even in the less flexible method of using a typewriter, different drafts were readily distinguishable by their altered layout. On my laptop, I can change the order events happen in a chapter with three section breaks in seconds—does that make it a new draft? Or, does a draft only exist when someone else, someone important like a literary agent or an editor, claps their eyes on it? Up until then, your story is a tree falling in the forest that no one hears.

With my last novel, I’ve tried a different way of editing, by staying in one or two chapters for several days. This has permitted me to finesse the descriptions while worrying that such tinkering around may be gilding the lily. I like this way of working, in that it’s encouraged me to consider the frame of mind of my characters at that particular moment, which might make their future behaviour more believable.

How do you edit….is it a daily chore, or weekly?

Do you do regular trawls through all you’ve written so far, perhaps using the Word Search function to find repeated words?

Are you content to leave the editing until you’ve completed the writing? I did that with my first novel, which admittedly was way too long at 179,000 words, and spent five months chipping barnacles off the hull of the monstrous leviathan I’d created. This woeful experience motivated me into doing regular editing of the WIP.

Are you fortunate enough to have a trusted reader, who offers helpful suggestions?

Image result for editing a book cartoon

Notes, Appendix, Footnotes, Glossary & Hyperlinks

In writing a fictional story, there are various ways of imparting extra information without adding bulk to the narrative. Some subjects depend on facts more than others, such as a historical novel or a forensic crime thriller.

Traditional printed novels have long used supplementary methods of aiding the reader’s understanding of what’s going on, by the use of footnotes or having a glossary, appendix or notes in the back of the book. These days, ebooks can use hyperlinks. This caused me some confusion when writing my first Cornish Detective novel.

I learnt most of what I know about formatting from Mark Coker, founder of Smashwords, who is a big fan of using hyperlinks, both to aid navigation around the book and to add value to the reading experience.

The problem with hyperlinks in a novel is that they look horrid on the page, and encouraging the reader to drift away from your book, to follow a link on the internet, is unwise. I have a hyperlinked version of my first manuscript, and it looks like someone has attacked it with a highlighter pen! Increasingly, I’m thinking that using numbered notes would be less intrusive.

As I understand it, these are the definitions of the different terms for ways of adding facts to fiction:

*Notes: a comment or instruction at the back of the book, linked by a number in the text.

*Appendix: supplementary material that is collected and appended at the back of a book.

*Footnote: a printed note placed below the text on a printed page

*Glossary: an alphabetical list of technical terms in some specialized field of knowledge; usually published as an appendix to a text on that field.

*Hyperlink: a link from a hypertext file to another location or file; typically activated by clicking on a highlighted word or icon at a particular location on the screen.

Andrea Camilleri uses notes in his Inspector Montalbano crime novels, set on Sicily. These are often about the food that his gourmand protagonist eats, which always makes me hungry for pasta! I’ve recently been reading another Italian crime series, written by Marco Vichi, in which Inspector Bordelli solves crimes in Florence during the 1960s and 1970s. Like Camilleri, Vichi details the ingredients of meals his main character eats. He’s a veteran of WW2, a partisan who fought the Nazis, so some of the notes explain such things as political affiliations back then, as well as battles and the many superstitions of religious Italians.

As an example, for the text “How long had it been since he had gone to Soffiano to visit his mother’s grave? He always sought to avoid going on the second of November.1Any other day was fine,” the explanatory note printed at the end of the story is, “12 November is ‘il giorno dei morti’, ‘the day of the dead’, when families throng to the cemeteries to visit their lost loved ones.” This is a neater way of explaining something, than doing so in the narrative. The reader can look to find the meaning, if they choose, or ignore the link.

Many genres of fiction don’t need extra information, other than what the story is telling the reader. It’s unlikely that romance, erotica, ghost stories, Western yarns or fantasy tales would feel the need to expand their readers’ knowledge. Modern day literature eschews notes, though reprints of classic novels often add them—to explain the historical context. Similarly, translations of foreign novels will include helpful information.

Series of stories sometimes cry out for footnotes or endnotes. I’ve read several of Terry Pratchett’s Discworld novels, which have humorous footnotes.

Do any of you use hyperlinks in your eBooks?

Have you added footnotes or endnotes?

If you write historical novels or technology-based stories, do you include an appendix or a glossary?

As a reader, do you check the facts that the writer directs you to—or ignore them?